The move gives exchanges, token issuers and traders a working jurisdictional map, but it’s an interpretation, not statute, and that distinction matters for anyone pricing regulatory risk into crypto positions.

This latest CLARITY Act news comes as the crypto market braces for today’s CPI data, which could shake Bitcoin out of its current consolidation around $64,000. The direction, though, is yet to be determined.

CLARITY Act Alternative: A Taxonomy Built for Speed, Not Statute

Under the new SEC-CFTC breakdown, the first four asset categories generally fall outside securities law, leaving digital securities as the only bucket firmly under SEC jurisdiction – though the agency notes it can still assert authority over specific nonsecurity assets in particular cases. That’s the ambiguity market structure legislation was supposed to erase, and it’s why the guidance reads as a stopgap rather than a settlement.

Ian Katz, managing partner at Capital Alpha, framed the calculation regulators are making given how slow formal rulemaking moves. “They’re not completely putting the brakes on, waiting for legislation,” he told The Hill.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins made the same point more bluntly at the DC Blockchain Summit, framing the guidance as overdue rather than optional.

“For over a decade, market participants have operated without clear guidance on the fundamental question – does a crypto asset implicate federal securities laws? So today, I’m pleased to announce that the SEC’s persistent failure to provide clarity on this question is over,” Atkins said.

Atkins also previewed a broader framework built around a startup exemption, a fundraising exemption and a safe harbor for crypto assets that have outgrown securities treatment, pieces that would normally live in statute, not agency interpretation.

Discover: Get Paid to Be Right, $25 to Start on Kalshi

The Senate’s Stablecoin Standoff

The House passed the CLARITY Act last July, but the Senate is divided, with the Agriculture committee advancing its section without Democratic votes and the Banking committee facing setbacks, including losing Coinbase’s support.

A key issue is stablecoin rewards, with banks seeking tighter restrictions, while the crypto industry argues this hinders their competitiveness. President Trump criticized the banks for undermining the GENIUS Act and urged swift action on market structure.

Senators Angela Alsobrooks and Thom Tillis have reportedly reached a bipartisan agreement on rewards, though details are vague. David Carlisle from Elliptic noted that the SEC and CFTC’s joint interpretation provides needed assurance amid the ongoing legislative uncertainty.

What Happens Next

Even if the Senate Banking Committee marks up its bill in April as targeted, lawmakers would still need to merge it with the Agriculture Committee’s version, clear a 60-vote floor threshold, and reconcile the result with the House’s CLARITY Act, all before midterm politics freeze legislative activity.

Sen. Bernie Moreno put a hard number on the risk: “If we don’t get the CLARITY Act passed by May, digital asset legislation will not pass for the foreseeable future.”

For traders, that timeline is the variable worth tracking over policy headlines about the guidance itself. An SEC interpretation can be revised or withdrawn by a future commission without a congressional vote, while a passed statute can’t.

This is a gap that has already shown up in how institutional flows have responded to the delay, and one that will continue to matter for how much durable pricing power crypto regulation actually carries this year.

Discover: Your Market Calls Are Worth Something. Start With Free $25 on Kalshi