NewsLayer.com

CryptoPolicy

breaking

EIP-7702 didn’t cause Binance hack, but may have amplified losses

Security experts say attackers could have drained Binance’s wallets without EIP-7702, but the Ethereum upgrade may have helped bypass withdrawal safeguards.

Cointelegraph by Helen Partz

Publisher Cointelegraph

Oct 30, 2026 at 11:00 AM UTC · 2 Min. Lesezeit

EIP-7702 didn’t cause Binance hack, but may have amplified losses
Image via Cointelegraph

Entities

ethereum, binance

Last Updated

vor einem Tag

Übersetzung…

Compromised signing systems likely enabled Binance’s $6.3 billion hack, while Ethereum’s EIP-7702 upgrade may have helped attackers bypass security checks, according to blockchain security firm Blockaid.

Attackers could have stolen the funds without EIP-7702, Ido Ben-Natan, Blockaid’s co-founder and CEO, told Cointelegraph on Friday.

“The 7702 upgrade is a way to do this in one sweep and maybe a way to bypass some sort of checks they may have,” Ben-Natan said, explaining that attackers otherwise would have needed multiple transactions.

Binance confirmed Friday that it had suffered a $6.3 billion hack, the largest in crypto history, and pledged to cover all losses. The exchange said it uncovered additional points of breach after initially suspecting a compromised laptop belonging to one of its engineers.

EIP-7702 faced security concerns before Binance hack

Ethereum introduced Ethereum Improvement Proposal 7702 (EIP-7702) in May 2025 as part of its Pectra upgrade, allowing ordinary wallets to use smart-contract features such as bundled transactions and sponsored gas fees.

Security concerns emerged within weeks. In May 2025, crypto trading firm Wintermute reported that most early EIP-7702 delegations pointed to malicious contracts designed to automatically drain compromised wallets.