This website uses cookies
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services.
Consent Selection
Details
  • Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
  • Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
    • __emg_sidPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: 1 dayType: HTTP Cookie
      __emg_vidPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: 1 yearType: HTTP Cookie
      nl-read-countPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: PersistentType: HTML Local Storage
Cookie declaration last updated on 8/12/26 by Cookiebot
[#IABV2_TITLE#]
[#IABV2_BODY_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_LEGITIMATE_INTEREST_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PREFERENCE_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS#]
About
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient.

The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission.

This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

You can at any time change or withdraw your consent from the Cookie Declaration on our website.

Learn more about who we are, how you can contact us and how we process personal data in our Privacy Policy.

Please state your consent ID and date when you contact us regarding your consent.
NewsLayer.com

Crypto’s first quantum attack will look like an unexplained breach: Quantus founder

Par Cointelegraph by Felix NgPublié il y a 3 jours 3 min de lecture
Crypto’s first quantum attack will look like an unexplained breach: Quantus founder

Crypto executives warn that the first use of a quantum computer capable of breaking current cryptography may appear as an unexplained breach rather than a public demonstration. They believe attackers would likely avoid highly visible targets such as wallets linked to Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.

Points Clés

  • 01 A cryptography-breaking quantum computer could be used quietly by bad actors.
  • 02 The first quantum-related crypto attack may resemble an ordinary unexplained security breach.
  • 03 High-profile Bitcoin wallets, including those associated with Satoshi Nakamoto, may be avoided because they would draw immediate attention.

The first sign that quantum computing has broken modern cryptography probably won’t be a splashy theft of Satoshi Nakamoto’s dormant Bitcoin. It could just be a wave of unrelated crypto wallet breaches with no trace of how an attacker did it, according to the founder of blockchain startup Quantus. 

“When someone cracks your key, you don’t get a memo saying how they did it,” Christopher Smith, CEO and co-founder of Quantus Network, told Cointelegraph. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive a private key from public keys exposed onchain, allowing an attacker to move funds without compromising a wallet, device or exchange’s internal systems. 

This makes the arrival of “Q-day” — a hypothetical future moment when quantum computers become powerful enough to break standard public-key cryptography — unusually difficult to detect. In a theft involving a highly secure organization, “the only forensic evidence would be that there was no breach,” Smith said.

Smith’s warning comes as advances in quantum algorithms have reduced estimates of computing resources needed to attack the elliptic-curve cryptography used by major blockchains. 

First target may not be Satoshi’s Bitcoin 

Much of the fear around Q-day in crypto is what will happen if a quantum computer cracks the keys securing Satoshi Nakamoto’s estimated Bitcoin holdings, worth $63 billion at the time of writing, which could be suddenly dumped on the market.

However, Smith said the first targets may be military systems and state secrets, while crypto attackers could go for even more valuable keys. 

“If I’m focusing on blockchain, what’s the single most valuable key? It’s probably Tether’s minting key,” Smith said. A quantum attacker could mint tokens out of thin air from an administrative wallet and dump them on the market before the issuer could respond, he added.

USDT is a multi-chain stablecoin, and some of the networks on which it is deployed are already actively working on post-quantum migration. 

Related: Jim Cramer plans to sell his Bitcoin over quantum fears as BTC rises 1.6%

Another theory is that attackers make a quieter opening move.

Sean Cheetham, a security researcher at Blockchain Capital, said an attacker would more likely target hot wallets at exchanges “that aren’t going to ring alarm bells rather than stealing Satoshi’s coins.”

Smith said an attacker may disguise a quantum theft as an ordinary compromise.

“There’s an alternative scenario where they… have these plausible, deniable [explanations]: ‘Oh, somebody just lost their keys somehow,’” he said.

Q-day timeline hard to pin down

In March, Google accelerated its post-quantum migration timeline to 2029 as an AI-assisted breakthrough showed elliptic curve cryptography can be cracked with far fewer physical qubits than previously forecasted.

NGRAVE CEO Roy Blackstone said earlier quantum forecasts failed to account for the parallel development of AI. 

“Most threat models assumed we had well into the next decade before quantum technology could realistically crack the cryptography securing public keys, but it did not account for how fast AI would develop alongside it.”

Despite growing urgency, there is little agreement on when a quantum computer capable of breaking modern cryptography will be ready.

Smith, whose company is developing a blockchain network aiming to be quantum-resistant from launch, said there was a “50-50” chance it could happen by 2028, arguing that continued AI-assisted improvements in quantum algorithms and hardware research are making forecasts less reliable. 

Cheetham said the early 2030s “definitely is almost a certainty” and that an earlier arrival was “more of a trailing probability.” 

Michael Coates, the Solana Foundation’s chief information security officer, declined to give an estimate during an earlier interview, saying “there’s no way to know.” 

“If you talk to people in the industry, it is always five years away, and it’s been that way for 10 years or more now. Perhaps today people say it’s four years away,” he said. But the uncertainty is not a reason to delay, he added.

“Thankfully, blockchains aren’t waiting and have started migrating to post-quantum signatures,” said Blackstone. “The damage would be catastrophic if they didn’t.”

Magazine: How AI just dramatically sped up the quantum risk for Bitcoin

Attribution

Originally reported by Cointelegraph

Reader Poll

Will a suspected quantum-related crypto breach be publicly identified within the next year?

Dernière Minute

Ne manquez aucune actualité de dernière minute

Les grandes nouvelles vont vite — recevez-les en premier sur X et Telegram.

Réponses Rapides

What could the first quantum attack on crypto look like?

According to crypto executives cited in the excerpt, it would likely look like an unexplained breach rather than an openly announced quantum attack.

Would a quantum attacker target Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin wallets first?

The excerpt says bad actors would probably avoid hacking Satoshi-linked wallets because they are highly visible and would attract attention.

Why would a quantum-capable attacker act quietly?

A quiet attack could allow an attacker to exploit cryptography-breaking capabilities without revealing that such a quantum computer exists.

Get stories like this, daily.

Daily crypto + regulation intelligence, straight to your inbox. Free.

Articles Liés