I’ve watched enough crypto interviews where 50 minutes pass

I’ve watched enough crypto interviews where 50 minutes pass and you still don’t know where the money comes from 😂 This @ZIGFinance conversation was different. @ARafayGadit went deep into the part I actually care about with projects like this: Where does the revenue come from? How does that revenue get back into the ecosystem? And what happens if the products actually scale? They talked through @Valdora_finance's real-world yield, tokenized assets, stablecoin strategies, institutional distribution and the monthly ethereum:0xb2617246d0c6c0087f18703d576831899ca94f01 buybacks funded through ZIG Finance activity. The latest buyback pulled 1.85M ethereum:0xb2617246d0c6c0087f18703d576831899ca94f01 from the market. That number matters more than another “massive partnership” headline because it connects actual business activity to the token. And the growth on the product side has been moving too, with TVL going from around $10M to above $60M. There’s also a bigger shift happening underneath all of this. ZIG isn’t presenting the chain as the finished product anymore. The chain is infrastructure for a financial layer that can originate, structure and distribute actual products. Private credit. Vaults. Tokenized assets. Stablecoins. That’s a much easier thesis to test. ➘ Revenue goes up? Buybacks should have room to grow. ➘ Products attract more capital? TVL should reflect it. ➘ Distribution expands? The ecosystem should have more economic activity. Now there are numbers to follow instead of just narratives to debate.