NewsLayer.com
NewsLayer PulseLIVEBTC$86,375+3.15%ETH$2,749+2.18%SOL$121.9+3.62%XRP$1.54+3.40%DOGE$0.0971+2.86%ADA$0.2571+4.38%Total Cap$3.07T+2.36%Layer Index56 Neutral

OpenAI cuts ties with 3 safety researchers, WSJ reports

OpenAI has parted ways with three safety researchers after an internal investigation found they mishandled sensitive company information, report says.

Aditya Mehta

Publisher TechCrunch AI

Oct 1, 2026 at 6:14 PM UTC · 1 min de lecture

OpenAI cuts ties with 3 safety researchers, WSJ reports
Image via TechCrunch AI
Traduction…

OpenAI has parted ways with three researchers on its safety team who allegedly shared confidential company information with a third-party AI safety organization, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

“We have parted ways with three individuals for violating our policies on accessing and handling sensitive company information,” an OpenAI spokesperson said in a statement to the Journal. “Our investigation confirmed that these individuals mishandled sensitive information outside established company procedures, violating our policies and breaking the trust essential to our work.”

The report did not name the researchers, the organization, or the information involved. OpenAI did not immediately respond to our request for comment.

Posts circulating on X named individuals some users believe were among those dismissed, who had also publicly expressed concerns about AI risk while at OpenAI. TechCrunch has not confirmed their identities.

In a statement to the Journal, an OpenAI spokesperson said an internal investigation confirmed the researchers had “mishandled sensitive information outside established company procedures.”

The departures come two days after The New York Times reported that OpenAI executives had brushed aside employees’ warnings about its safety practices, with employees describing a broader pattern of the company deprioritizing security. An OpenAI spokesperson told the Times the company takes security concerns seriously and has internal channels for reporting safety issues, while saying it recognized “a need to move faster.”