- The Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals said Nevada has the authority to apply gaming regulations to Kalshi’s sports event contracts.
- The CFTC said prediction market products are derivatives under the CEA and therefore fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction, and it strongly objected to the ruling.
- The legal clash between federal and state governments over prediction-market regulation is continuing, raising the possibility that the case could move to the U.S. Supreme Court.
US Appeals Court Backs Nevada’s Authority to Regulate Kalshi Sports Contracts
A US appeals court has backed Nevada’s authority to regulate Kalshi sports contracts. The decision supports the state’s role in overseeing these contracts within its jurisdiction.
bloomingbit
Publisher
Aug 30, 2026 at 3:37 AM UTC · 2 분 소요

Forecast Trend Report by Period
A federal appeals court has upheld Nevada’s authority to regulate sports event contracts, intensifying a fight between federal and state officials over control of prediction markets. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission sharply criticized the ruling and said the dispute could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Block reported on August 28 that the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found Kalshi failed to show that the Commodity Exchange Act preempts Nevada gaming rules covering sports event contracts.
The appeals court also found that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in dissolving a preliminary injunction that had previously shielded Kalshi. The decision clears the way for Nevada to apply its own gaming regulations to Kalshi’s sports event contracts.
Article Intelligence
Topics
Related Coverage
Sponsored
AdNewsLayer Premium
Unlock deeper intelligence.
Ad-free reading, exclusive research, and real-time onchain insights.
Go Premium
