This website uses cookies
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services.
Consent Selection
Details
  • Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
  • Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
    • __emg_sidPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: 1 dayType: HTTP Cookie
      __emg_vidPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: 1 yearType: HTTP Cookie
      nl-read-countPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: PersistentType: HTML Local Storage
Cookie declaration last updated on 8/12/26 by Cookiebot
[#IABV2_TITLE#]
[#IABV2_BODY_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_LEGITIMATE_INTEREST_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PREFERENCE_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS#]
About
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient.

The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission.

This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

You can at any time change or withdraw your consent from the Cookie Declaration on our website.

Learn more about who we are, how you can contact us and how we process personal data in our Privacy Policy.

Please state your consent ID and date when you contact us regarding your consent.
NewsLayer.com

Luke Dashjr Removed as BIP Editor After BIP-110 Bitcoin Fork Stalls

Publicado há um dia 2 min de leitura
Luke Dashjr Removed as BIP Editor After BIP-110 Bitcoin Fork Stalls

Luke Dashjr Removed as BIP Editor After BIP-110 Bitcoin Fork Stalls Decrypt

In brief

  • Luke Dashjr has been removed as a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal editor and no longer holds editor or admin access to the BIPs repository.
  • Fellow editor Mark "Murch" Erhardt filed the motion on August 9, citing a conflict of interest over BIP-110, minimal contribution to the role, and a breakdown in coordination between editors.
  • Dashjr has continued to dispute the outcome and said on Monday he was taking a sabbatical from mining pool Ocean.

Luke Dashjr has lost his role as a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal editor, days after the soft fork he championed split off a chain that mined two blocks and stopped.

Fellow editor Mark Erhardt, who goes by Murch, put the motion to the Bitcoin Development Mailing List on August 9 and opened a pull request the same day as what he called a sample implementation of it.

Erhardt gave four grounds, arguing first that Dashjr had exercised editorial authority "inconsistently with the established editorial process unfairly favoring the proposal he was involved in," pointing to an attempt to assign BIP-110 a number publicly on X before it had been discussed on the mailing list, and to a merge completed within minutes of the pull request opening.

He also said Dashjr had left "fewer than 1% of the BIP Editor comments" in the repository since additional editors joined in April 2024, and that the disputed merge was his first since May 2024. Championing a soft fork that "now appears to evolve into a hard fork" amounted to "a complete departure from the Bitcoin development ecosystem," he wrote, adding that trust and coordination with the other editors had broken down.

A role with no exit

The request itself proposes deleting a single line, striking Dashjr's name from BIP 3, the document that lists the editors. Backing for it has been registered in thumbs-up reactions and comments on the pull request.

Dashjr has kept arguing the point on X since, writing that "Core isn't supposed to have ANY control of the BIPs repo." He still refuses to treat the majority chain as Bitcoin, calling it "Bpedo" and arguing that it is “guaranteed to fail.”

He said on Monday that he was taking a sabbatical from Ocean, the mining pool that lists him as chairman and chief technology officer, adding that he would “turn my immediate focus to working on Bitcoin and open-source projects to support Bitcoin.”

BIP-110 sought to temporarily bar non-financial data such as Ordinals inscriptions from Bitcoin transactions, and support for it peaked at 51 of 2,016 blocks in the period before the split, or 2.53%, against the 55% needed to activate.

Not one block has signalled for the proposal since mandatory signalling began at block 961,632, according to BIP110 Monitor. Strategy's Michael Saylor, among the proposal's critics, tweeted that 99.85% of hashpower stayed with Bitcoin.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Attribution

Originally reported by Decrypt

Get stories like this, daily.

Daily crypto + regulation intelligence, straight to your inbox. Free.

Notícias Relacionadas