NewsLayer.com
NewsLayer PulseLIVEBTC$84,770+0.31%ETH$2,686+0.69%SOL$119.7+0.91%XRP$1.49+0.12%DOGE$0.0929-0.02%ADA$0.2444-0.02%Total Cap$3.02T+0.54%Layer Index51 Neutral

OpenAI pulls plug on ‘untrustworthy’ new AI model as tech doomerism mounts: report

OpenAI reportedly slammed the brakes on releasing its next-gen AI model after finding it was not trustworthy – the latest example of the artificial intelligence industry proceeding with caution amid growing doomer warnings about the tech.

nypost.com

Publisher

Sep 28, 2026 at 10:49 PM UTC · Updated há 5 dias · 2 min de leitura

OpenAI pulls plug on ‘untrustworthy’ new AI model as tech doomerism mounts: report
Image via nypost.com
Traduzindo…

OpenAI reportedly slammed the brakes on releasing its next-gen AI model after finding it was not trustworthy – the latest example of the artificial intelligence industry proceeding with caution amid growing doomer warnings about the tech.

The company scrapped an October release for the product, known as GPT-6.1 Astra, after researchers found it wasn’t always forthright when it came to telling users what it was doing during internal testing, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday.

On top of that, the mischievous model was reportedly prone to push ahead on tasks without human authorization and sometimes tried to use potentially unsafe tools and services.

OpenAI reportedly canceled the October release of its latest next-gen AI model after finding it “untrustworthy.” REUTERS

OpenAI’s head of safety systems Saachi Jain told the paper that GPT-6.1 Astra wasn’t reliable enough to release safely.

GPT-6.1 Astra would have been better than previous OpenAI products at hard challenges performed without human assistance, along with writing, according to the Journal.

But among other issues, it fell short when it came to “alignment,” a term of art describing how well an AI does what humans want it to do.

“For anything regarding safety and alignment, there’s a trade off,” Jain told the Journal. “You really do need to find what’s the right line between staying within scope, but also avoiding laziness in terms of how the model actually pursues tasks even when it hits friction.”