NewsLayer.com
NewsLayer PulseLIVEBTC$79,043-1.25%ETH$2,485-0.92%SOL$103.61-2.13%XRP$1.39-2.02%DOGE$0.0901-0.14%ADA$0.2191-1.02%Total Cap$2.82T-0.76%Layer Index41 Neutral

Quantum computing in drug discovery

Early-stage decisions in the pharmaceutical development process carry outsized consequences for eventual clinical success, yet the computational tools underpinning these decisions remain fundamentally constrained. Computer-aided drug…

Frontiers

Publisher

Sep 6, 2026 at 7:00 AM UTC · Updated há 4 horas · 63 min de leitura

Quantum computing in drug discovery
Image via Frontiers
Traduzindo…

Abstract

Early-stage decisions in the pharmaceutical development process carry outsized consequences for eventual clinical success, yet the computational tools underpinning these decisions remain fundamentally constrained. Computer-aided drug design (CADD) has transformed how researchers navigate chemical space and predict ligand–target interactions, but classical implementations rely on mechanical force-field approximations that fail to capture polarisation, charge transfer, and electron correlation effects central to molecular recognition and reactivity. Quantum-mechanical treatments that correctly describe these phenomena scale exponentially with system size on classical hardware, rendering them impractical for drug-relevant biomolecules. Quantum computing offers a physically motivated path beyond this scaling barrier: by exploiting superposition, entanglement, and interference, quantum algorithms can in principle simulate electronic structure with polynomial resource requirements for targeted problem classes. This article provides a theoretical review of how quantum computation integrates throughout the drug discovery pipeline, from target identification to lead optimisation. Its primary contribution is a pipeline-level mapping of quantum methods—including the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), quantum machine learning, and quantum-enhanced optimisation—to specific drug development stages. The review critically distinguishes near-term NISQ (Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum: current devices with 50–1,000 noisy qubits operating without full error correction) capabilities from fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) requirements, quantifies current resource gaps through a worked CYP3A4 case study, and identifies algorithmic limitations (barren plateaus, ansatz expressibility, measurement overhead), hardware scalability, and error correction overhead as the principal barriers to practical deployment.

Article Intelligence

Topics

Sponsored

Ad
House — Advertise on NewsLayer
NewsLayerLearn more

NewsLayer Premium

Unlock deeper intelligence.

Ad-free reading, exclusive research, and real-time onchain insights.

Go Premium