This website uses cookies
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services.
Consent Selection
Details
  • Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
  • Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
    • We do not use cookies of this type.

  • Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
    • __emg_sidPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: 1 dayType: HTTP Cookie
      __emg_vidPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: 1 yearType: HTTP Cookie
      nl-read-countPending
      Maximum Storage Duration: PersistentType: HTML Local Storage
Cookie declaration last updated on 8/12/26 by Cookiebot
[#IABV2_TITLE#]
[#IABV2_BODY_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_LEGITIMATE_INTEREST_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PREFERENCE_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS#]
About
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient.

The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission.

This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

You can at any time change or withdraw your consent from the Cookie Declaration on our website.

Learn more about who we are, how you can contact us and how we process personal data in our Privacy Policy.

Please state your consent ID and date when you contact us regarding your consent.
NewsLayer

Install NewsLayer

Get the app experience — one tap from your home screen, instant loads and breaking-news alerts.

NewsLayer.com
NewsLayer PulseLIVEBTC$62,677-1.18%ETH$1,873-0.63%SOL$75.34-1.14%XRP$0.9989-0.97%DOGE$0.0693-1.08%ADA$0.1792-1.68%Total Cap$2.26T-0.98%Layer Index42 Neutral
External ReportingUpdated 11 小时前

Cutting 72% Of The World's Submarine Cables Wouldn't Bring Down Bitcoin - But Five Hosting Providers Might

A paper published on arXiv in February by Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance researchers Wenbin Wu and Alexander Neumueller presents the first longitudinal study of Bitcoin's physical infrastructure resilience, covering 11 years…

Cutting 72% Of The World's Submarine Cables Wouldn't Bring Down Bitcoin - But Five Hosting Providers Might
Publisher Yellow.com 3 分钟阅读
Image via Yellow.com

Market Context

Bitcoin

BTC

$62,677

-1.18% 24h

Layer Index

42

↓ 2 pts in 24h

A paper published on arXiv in February by Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance researchers Wenbin Wu and Alexander Neumueller presents the first longitudinal study of Bitcoin's physical infrastructure resilience, covering 11 years of peer-to-peer network data, 658 submarine cables, and 68 verified cable fault events.

The headline finding: between 72% and 92% of the world's inter-country submarine cables would need to fail simultaneously before Bitcoin (BTC) suffers significant node disconnection.

A targeted attack on five major hosting providers, however, could achieve similar disruption by removing just 5% of routing capacity.

The paper arrives as submarine cable sabotage has drawn heightened geopolitical attention, with the Strait of Hormuz disrupted and infrastructure attacks increasingly common in contested regions.

What the Data Shows

The researchers ran 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations per scenario across the full dataset. Of the 68 real-world cable fault events studied, 87% caused less than 5% node impact.

The largest single event - when seabed disturbances off Côte d'Ivoire severed seven to eight cables simultaneously in March 2024 - affected only five to seven Bitcoin nodes globally, roughly 0.03% of the network.

The correlation between cable failures and Bitcoin's price was -0.02, effectively zero. The asymmetry becomes stark when the attack model shifts from random to targeted.

While random cable removal requires a 72–92% threshold to cause fragmentation, targeting cables with the highest betweenness centrality - those serving as continental chokepoints - drops that threshold to 20%. Targeting just five hosting providers (Hetzner, OVH, Comcast, Amazon, and Google Cloud) by node count reduces it further to 5%.

The Tor Finding

As of 2025, 64% of Bitcoin nodes route through Tor, making their physical locations unobservable. The assumption had been that hidden locations might conceal fragility.

The study found the opposite. Tor relay infrastructure is concentrated in Germany, France, and the Netherlands - countries with the densest submarine cable redundancy and the most robust terrestrial fiber connections. The four-layer multiplex model the researchers built showed Tor adding between 0.02 and 0.10 to the critical failure threshold, not subtracting from it.

Network resilience declined 22% between 2018 and 2021 as geographic concentration peaked during the East Asian mining boom, hitting a low of 0.72 in 2021. China's mining ban forced redistribution; the threshold recovered to 0.88 by 2022 before settling at 0.78 in 2025.

Why It Matters

The research establishes a quantitative framework for two categorically different threat models.

Random infrastructure failures - from ship anchors, earthquakes, or conflict - present negligible risk to Bitcoin's operational continuity at any realistic scale.

Coordinated, state-level targeting of specific hosting chokepoints is a structurally different adversary, and one the network's topology is considerably less equipped to resist.

Kostiantyn Tsentsura is a Content Writer at Yellow.com with over 8 years of experience in crypto, dedicating the last 4 years to writing about the industry. Based in Kyiv, he’s passionate about football, fishing, and kayaking. When he’s not tracking market trends or exploring crypto news, you’ll find him on the water—because even in crypto, sometimes it’s best to just go with the flow.

突发新闻

Never miss a breaking story

Advertisement

House — Advertise on NewsLayer
NewsLayerAd

Sourced by

Originally reported by Yellow.com

NewsLayer coverage based on externally reported material.

The Daily Brief

The onchain economy, before your day starts.

Curated markets, onchain insights, and key headlines — delivered every weekday morning.

Weekdays · Free · ~5 minute read

相关报道