Binance’s $6.3 billion security incident has left unanswered questions about how the exchange managed its hot wallets and limited the amount attackers could access.
Binance’s $6.3B hack leaves questions over hot wallet safeguards
Experts say blockchain records show repeated wallet drains but cannot establish Binance’s internal signing controls or transaction limits.
Cointelegraph by Helen Partz
Publisher Cointelegraph
Nov 6, 2026 at 10:40 AM UTC · 2 Min. Lesezeit

Entities
binance
Last Updated
vor 3 Stunden
Binance co-CEO Richard Teng said on Oct. 30 that the attack affected the exchange’s own hot wallet. Most customer assets were held in offline cold storage and moved to hot wallets only when users requested withdrawals.
Wallet balances offer only a partial picture of an exchange’s exposure to an attack. Public blockchain records can show funds moving but cannot establish the internal controls governing those transfers, CertiK analyst Jonathan Riss told Cointelegraph.
In its initial report Tuesday, Binance said attackers accessed an internal wallet-signing service to move funds outside its normal withdrawal process. Binance said some technical details would remain confidential to prevent further attacks.
The exchange did not respond to Cointelegraph’s questions about its wallet balances and safeguards.
Rivals including Coinbase, Gate and Upbit have disclosed their cold-storage ratios following the attack.
What blockchain records can reveal
Riss said the $6.3 billion figure represented the cumulative value of assets affected across 10 blockchains. On Ethereum, attackers repeatedly drained a hot wallet as new deposits arrived.
Market Context
Ethereum
ETH
$2,233
-4.63% (24H)
Market Cap
$272.6B
Circulating Supply
122.2M ETH
24H Volume
$17.9B
24H High
$2,388
Article Intelligence
Key Entities
Topics
Related Coverage
Sponsored
AdNewsLayer Premium
Unlock deeper intelligence.
Ad-free reading, exclusive research, and real-time onchain insights.
Go Premium
